Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Of course Rhoda shrunk Tom and his friend down to 1/3 their normal size. Why wouldn't she?

My love of having size changes be math determined resulted in me deciding Lucy would wind up half-sized, but with a particular part of her remaining full sized. I think I would have preferred this if she just evenly shrank all around, but I didn't know that until I tried it.

In any case, BUNNY! Hop hop hoppity

Files

Comments

Anonymous

I don't think Tom Tom is in this one

coredumperror

This is a very yummy page! So much to like! Is he blowing those fans at her in panel 1 because she's "hot"?

ZekeStaright

I like the (x 1/2 - DD) Having a greater reduction with some addition so she'd be stuck there a while would be nice too

Connie Edogawa

Lucy: "well, well, well~ if it isn't little Rhoda~. hey, have you gotten even SMALLER lately~?" Rhoda: "tell you what. I'll show you smaller~ but you're allowed to keep the one part of you I like at full size."

M.

I've never been a real fan of shrinking, but this is a variant I think I like. :)

Stephen Gilberg

Just because they're transformed doesn't mean they're not jerks anymore.

McZed

This is quite satisfying. Thank you.

James C

Applying the Conservation of Mass? When one thing shrinks, two things have to get slightly larger...

BJ

More like squishing than shrinking, like Tedd said with the variable watches?

Merle Blue

I really like this idea of partial shrinking.