Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Hey :3

Over the past few months I've received a lot of comments on social media that my art looks like AI or is generated by AI. It's kind of annoying, but whatever.

Lately though, some people have been trying to prove that my art is AI generated.

As many of you know, especially those who support my Golden Tier, I record the painting processes of my artwork and share them monthly, so there's a video of the development process of every single piece of artwork I've created over the past 6 years, proving that I paint it myself.

I have uploaded some of my older artwork to two of those sites that claim to prove whether an image is AI-generated or not.

Here's a little video showing the result (~15MB Download from Mediafire)

All the images you see here were drawn by me in 2017-2022, before the flood of AI images. Yet Optic AI or Not claims that they are AI-generated, which is simply wrong, as it is not possible in terms of time.

Sometimes the sites switches from human to AI and vice versa, which tells me that this sites should not be relied upon.

It is a shame that artists have to deal with such false accusations, especially because it is a difficult time for artists.

In my opinion, this is a dangerous impertinence, as it serves as a breeding ground for false accusations against artists.

Sorry for the long post, but I thought I should share my thoughts on this.

I'm very grateful to have such a friendly community here, thank you all for your great support, it means the world to me ♥

~ Dandon

Files

Comments

Anonymous

The concept of detecting AI generated art by inspecting the digital image in question is nonsense, as the whole point of AI generated art is to mimic the real thing. Its obvious you do your own art given your art predates the AI tools in question.

AwesomePatron9

Yet another problem caused by AI. It's unfortunate this is happening to you. Just know that if I unsubscribe it's because I'm low on funds, not because of this.

Aesir_Ralf_96

Never doubted you are making your own flow and style, it really differs from how AI artwork looks like, and yours is always amazing... PD: please keep in mind some Ivy Valentine artwork with her SC6 costume, now that you are going on previous gals getting updated sketches.

Anonymous

I fiddle with both AI detector. It looks like AI or Not suggests a lot are AI art and Maybe's is more conservative? And Maybe's has a % suggestion. So, like Power Girl was suggested as AI from AI or Not, but it was only like 61% AI? And if I upload the nude version, it drops to 23% AI.

BlueSeagull

I've been a member for long enough to know, even before watching a video, that you can do what you do without AI. AI doesn't show the kind of improvement over time, you have, the consistency of OCs, heck until sometime this year it couldn't even get the number of fingers on a human consistent. In conclusion, Bubble's a cutie, 10/10.

T_B_Tato

If you WERE using AI, why would you start posting less art per pack? it would make way more sense to start pumping out more and more. Your work is far more detailed, and the MANY variations of each piece could only come from a real artist.

Baster306

Some people just stupid enough to accuse someone before checking something. I mean you were drawing long before this AI-shit started.

Anonymous

You are an amazing artist who had set the bar for what I expect from artists I support. You're the rule. Keep doing you. I will stand with you. I believe in you, and I'm happy to have found you.

Christian

They're being compared/flagged because people are most likely using your art as material to feed the algorithms.

Call_me_Snake

You can see that eyes, fingers and feet are weird on AI generated images, which is certainly not the case with your amazing work ! 😎