Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Surprises me folks like Bill do not see the impact of higher rates on a 130% debt to GDP ratio.  I guess he is talking his own book?

Bill Ackman, founder of hedge fund Pershing Square, took aim at Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's view of the fed funds rate after the latest 75-basis-point hike.


"On Wed, Powell said that the @federalreserve had gotten rates to neutral: 'We’re at 2.25 to 2.5 and that’s right in the range of what we think is neutral,'" Ackman tweeted. "The bond and stock market have rallied substantially since as the implication is that rates need not increase much more."


"The problem is that we are not close to a neutral rate," Ackman said. "While 2.25 to 2.25% may be a neutral rate with 2% inflation, it is an extremely accommodative rate with inflation at 9%. One’s cost of borrowing is a function of the interest rate and the rate of inflation during the term of the loan."


Ackman is not alone. There is a large amount of skepticism about the Fed already hitting neutral.


"Inflation reduces the cost of borrowing as it is the ‘real’ interest rate that matters. The money in your savings account is decreasing by about 1% per month due to inflation so you are incentivized to spend it and borrow more," Ackman added. "While businesses and consumers don’t borrow at the 2.25-2.5% FF rate, they pay a spread. But even at today’s credit spreads, the real cost of money is still extremely cheap so everyone is incentivized to borrow and spend, fueling inflation."


"That is why in previous highly inflationary economies, the Fed had to raise rates above prevailing levels of inflation to kill it. While I do think inflation will begin to come down soon, I don’t think there is any prospect of getting back to 2% without materially higher rates, 4% or more, which are maintained at these levels for extended periods."


"I am puzzled to understand how the Fed believes that we are already at neutral," Ackman said. "It is counter to everything I understand about basic economics."


"A neutral rate of 2.25-2.5% only makes sense in a world with 2% stable inflation. It makes no sense in a world with 9%, 6% or even 4% inflation," he said.


"Powell’s views on the neutral rate have only served to materially ease financial conditions making the inflation problem worse and his job more difficult. The Fed should clarify how it has determined that we are indeed at neutral. Greater clarity would be helpful for all."


Files

Ackman says rates should be 'materially higher' to kill inflation

July 29 (Reuters) - Billionaire investor Bill Ackman on Thursday said he expected inflation to come down soon, but not to the level of 2% unless the U.S. Federal Reserve maintained "materially higher" interest rates for an extended period. Ackman's comments come after the Fed announced a 75-basis-point rate increase in interest rates on Wednesday.

Comments

Anonymous

The situation is worse than that because there are no more serious buyers of debt so what happens next…? Oh, and don’t forget the ENORMOUS derivatives bubble. And the deaths from the jabs. And the plans of the global communists. And the Grand Solar Minimum. Sorry to be a bringer of dark tidings but that’s the reality.

Anonymous

Inflation at 2%. Seriously where do they get these numbers!?

Anonymous

I think conspiracy theorists have never been project managers. Planning (or faking) major events requires hundreds or thousands of people. Getting even a dozen people to do everything they are supposed to do, without spilling the beans to someone, is nearly impossible.

Anonymous

Yeah, that’s the usual claim of those who don’t bother doing the necessary research. Which of the topics I mentioned are a ‘conspiracy theory’ in your eyes? Well, when you’re ready… how about Kennedy not being assassinated by a lone gunmen? Not putting men on the moon? 9/11 was an inside job? The climate change con? And let’s not start on everything that’s happened since the beginning of 2020.

Anonymous

As I’ve mentioned, we are not dealing with a normal business cycle. There is a great reset coming and it’s just a matter of which flavour.

Anonymous

The problem is that it would take volumes to dispel/explain all of the problems with those beliefs, while it only takes a mere paragraph for you to spread them. Therefore this isn't the forum for debunking falsehoods. Good day...

Anonymous

But it might be a good starting point to encourage others to do their own research given that politicians are corrupt and lie as a matter of course.