Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Key takeaway:

1) 75 or 50 bps in July

2) depends on economic data

3) no mention beyond that and he normally telegraphs

4) I think he is trying to talk (jawbone) inflation down and they have done that very well seeing demand destruction

5) KEY SENTENCE: "policy makers must be nimble if conditions surprise" ie if recession is in play they will pivot IMHO

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-22/powell-sees-ongoing-rate-hikes-needed-to-tame-hot-inflation

While Powell told reporters last week that another 75 basis-point increase, or a 50 basis-point move, was on the table for the next meeting in late July, Wednesday’s text made no reference to the size of future rate hikes. Fed Governor Christopher Waller said Saturday that he would support a 75-basis-point rate increase in July should economic data come in as he expects.

Files

Comments

Anonymous

I think many people take these things at their word. People in power have the luxury of lying to you and doing whatever they want. My thesis is that working back from the November elections, will be an 'Event' of world changing proportions that would be an obvious excuse to pivot. I have no idea, but looking at the guest speakers on the Builderburg meeting list... Included handpicked experts on cybersecurity and digital warfare. Leaders of all stripes have been briefed on a 'Cyberpandemic' (Klaus Schwab's word) and last year the WEF held its own drill CyberPolygon. To have enough time for media blitz, reaction, campaigning... I say around mid September, New massive budget in Oct and then Elections.

Anonymous

The Fed, like the other ABC Agencies, is too politicized. Average working Americans knew inflation wasn’t transitory when it began because we live in the “real” world, not the Beltway bubble. Creative catch phrases doesn’t change anything. Like many in the Community noted - it’s the midterms. That adds another variable to the equation. Thanks James.

Anonymous

The transitory idea was based on supply shock catching up. It is taking much longer than originally predicted. Then, the war happened. Insult to injury.

Anonymous

That was their premise following their catastrophic energy policy decision and move made day 1. I responded to your comment, but once again, it was lost. It is so difficult using this site because the font is so tiny. If you enlarge it, the app does not work well. Anyway, it’s too cumbersome to type it again.

Anonymous

Not sure what energy has to do with anything except that which was imposed by Russia on the world. We didn't have a supply issue until then.

Anonymous

It has to do with everything. Prices/inflation/energy began surging before the invasion.

Anonymous

Yes, we also had a massive economic reopening and the highest GDP since Reagan. GDP growth causes inflation, they go hand in hand.