Home
Artists
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register
Partychan Telegram Find&Fuck Waifus ThePornDude
Home Artists Posts Import Register

Finally, good news. (Patreon)

Published:
2018-01-03 22:41:44
Imported:
2021-02

Content

Long story short since I don't want to feed the drama even more, I had enough of it.

The motion sent against us was referred to a Magistrate Judge to make a report and recommendation to a District Judge on how to rule on it.
The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissal of the lawsuit based on lack of personal jurisdiction.

We're waiting for the District Judge to accept the recommendation, sign off, then we be free to continue working on this game freely.

I've sent all the documentation to Patreon, as soon as they give me the signal I'll restore the links in these pages.

Files

Comments

Anonymous

I get that this is a super old post, but curious that gats would take issue here and not with Fenoxo. Well this prolly makes more monies so making a reason to get them would makes sense.

SirMalo

FFS finally...no more BS from Gats and his "i didn't know about that, now i have to lawsuit you!" excuses. <3

Jonas Wulff Christiansen

This great new, i am happy for you all on the team :D it must be really great to throw off that burden that comes with that kind of shit hanging over ones head all the time.

Kitsune

hopefully you can also restore the portraits rewards, i really like them.

Anonymous

And when it's done maybe the no Double Jeopardy thing means this can't happen again!

Tzeneth

Umm, they're dismissing on lack of personal jurisdiction? That means this might not be over as a lack of personal jurisdiction means that they brought up the case in the wrong court and they could potentially refile in the right court. @EvilEye, dismissal due to lack of jurisdiction is usually not done with prejudice. The only issue would be one of time if there is some type of statue of limitations relevant to the case in whatever would be the CORRECT jurisdiction for the case to be brought up. The case is not being dismissed on its merits but on where the case was brought up to begin with.

towerkc
>>9261600

I don't want to divulge personal informations, but they brought up the case in this specific court for a reason. It's -extremely- unlikely they'd be able to do it again in another state, for a series of reasons. The lack of jurisdiction is also not the only reason why we're expecting the case to be dismissed.